Search The Database
Displaying 51 - 60 of 502
Location | Gear | Catch | Technique | Bycatch species | Type | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gulf of Maine |
Dredge
|
Scallop |
Excluder devices
|
Sea Turtles | Field study in the wild | A chain mat placed on Northwest Atlantic dredge gear eliminated bycatch of sea turtles: loggerhead (Caretta caretta), leatherback (Dermocheles coriacea), and green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas). The chain mat reduced catch by 6.71%. |
Florida |
Hooks-and-Lines
|
King mackerel |
Quick-release gear
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) | Field study in the wild | A quick-release metal wire added to the Florida king mackerel troll fishery reduced depredation of catch by bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). There was no impact on king mackerel catch. |
Flume tank |
Trawls
|
Scallop |
Excluder devices
|
Pinnipeds | Field study in the wild | Excluded experimental dummy seals |
United Kingdom |
Trawls
|
Bass |
Excluder devices
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) | Field study in the wild | An excluder device, tested in the United Kingdom bass pair trawl fishery, reduced bycatch of common dolphins (Delphinus delphis). There was a negligible loss of target fish (<1%). |
Hawaii |
Hooks-and-Lines
|
Swordfish and tuna |
Sub-surface sets (gillnets)
|
Seabirds | Field study in the wild | Underwater setting chutes, blue-dyed bait, and side-sets each reduced the bycatch of seabirds (Laysan and black-footed albatross and short-tailed shearwater) in the Hawaiian longline tuna and swordfish fisheries. Side-sets showed the most promise for a bycatch mitigation technique while blue-dyed bait was the least effective at reducing seabird bycatch and shows the least promise of these methods as an effective bycatch mitigation strategy. |
Hawaii |
Hooks-and-Lines
|
Swordfish and tuna |
Dyed bait
|
Seabirds | Field study in the wild | Reduced bycatch but least effective of 3 tested techniques |
Hawaii |
Hooks-and-Lines
|
Swordfish and tuna |
Side sets
|
Seabirds | Field study in the wild | Reduced bycatch; most promising of 3 tested techniques |
Gulf of Mexico |
Trawls
|
shrimp |
Excluder devices
|
Sea Turtles | Field study in the wild | Turtle excluder devices reduce sea turtle and non-target finfish (Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulateus), spot (Leiostomus exanthurus), sea catfish (Arius felis), and weakfish (Cynoscion regalis)) bycatch in the Gulf of Mexico prawn trawl fishery. Catch of targeted shrimp varied by location and TED configuration, but there was no significant difference in shrimp catch rates in 3 of the 4 TEDs when compared with a control net. One experimental TED in Texas exhibited a decrease in shrimp catch. |
Washington State |
Gillnets
|
Salmon |
Acoustic deterrent devices
Visual deterrents
|
Seabirds | Field study in the wild | Variable depending on seabird species |
Washington State |
Gillnets
|
Salmon |
Acoustic deterrent devices
Visual deterrents
|
Seabirds | Field study in the wild | Reduced bycatch but results varied by mesh size |