Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise)

Displaying 11 - 20 of 32

Study Type: 

Field study in the wild

Location: 

Cornwall

Target catch: 

Monkfish

Effect on bycatch species: 

One incidentally caught harbor porpoise; significant reduction in the number of porpoise clicks at nets with pingers. Pinger effects stronger at quiet sites; no habituation observed, exclusion of porpoises following pinger use for as much as 7 hrs

Effect on target catch: 

None reported

Article: 

Study Type: 

Field study in the wild

Location: 

Southwest England

Target catch: 

None reported

Effect on bycatch species: 

DDD's caught significantly fewer porpoises but no significant difference in dolphin bycatch was observed

Effect on target catch: 

None reported

Article: 

Study Type: 

Field study in the wild

Location: 

Baltic

Target catch: 

None reported

Effect on bycatch species: 

Pingers significantly reduced echolocation encounter rates by 50-100% at 500m; sighting reduced up to 375m. Porpoise return time was 6 hrs when pingers were silent after being active for 24 hrs 50 min

Effect on target catch: 

None reported

Article: 

Study Type: 

Field study in the wild

Location: 

North Sea

Target catch: 

Cod

Effect on bycatch species: 

Reduced catch rates from 0.00229 and 0.00295 for nets with dummy pingers and no pingers respectively, to 0.00015 for nets with active pingers

Effect on target catch: 

None reported

Article: 

Study Type: 

Field study in the wild

Location: 

Turkey

Target catch: 

turbot fish

Effect on bycatch species: 

Reduced harbor porpoise interactions with gillnet

Effect on target catch: 

Use of pingers did not signficiantly affect catch rates or size of fish caught

Article: 

Study Type: 

Field study in the wild

Location: 

Washington State

Target catch: 

Salmon & sturgeon

Effect on bycatch species: 

Reduced harbor porpoise bycatch

Effect on target catch: 

Did not affect target catch

Article: 

Bycatch species: 

Reduction technique: 

Fishing Gear: 

Pages